Educational content only — not investment adviceAdvertiser disclosure
investing basicswealth_builder

What Is the Rule of 55?

The Rule of 55 is an informal name for a federal exception to the 10% additional tax on certain early retirement-plan distributions. It can apply when a worker separates from the employer maintaining a qualified plan in or after the calendar year the worker reaches age 55. This guide explains the age test, eligible plans, IRA differences, taxes, rollovers and special public-safety rules.

By ROIStreet EditorialReviewed by ROIStreet PublisherLast reviewed: 2026-08-17Editorial process19 min read✓ Fact-checked

Research. Education. Perspective.

The Rule of 55 is an informal name for a federal tax exception that can allow certain people who leave an employer to take distributions from that employer's qualified retirement plan before age 59½ without the usual 10% additional tax on early distributions.[1][2][3]

The rule is easy to oversimplify.

It does not mean:

  • every withdrawal after age 55 is tax-free
  • every retirement account qualifies
  • an IRA receives the same exception
  • leaving a job at any age and waiting until 55 is enough
  • every old 401(k) from every former employer automatically qualifies

The ordinary version of the rule depends on a specific relationship among:

  1. the participant
  2. the calendar year of separation from service
  3. the employer maintaining the qualified plan
  4. the account from which the distribution is made

For most participants, the central requirement is that separation from service occur:

in or after the calendar year in which the participant reaches age 55.[1][3]

That calendar-year wording creates results that are not always intuitive.

Key Takeaways

  • The Rule of 55 is an exception to the 10% additional tax, not an exemption from ordinary income tax.[1][2][3]
  • For the ordinary rule, separation from service must occur in or after the year the participant reaches age 55.[1][3]
  • A person can potentially qualify even if the separation occurs before the actual 55th birthday, as long as it occurs during the calendar year in which age 55 is reached.[3]
  • A person who separated in an earlier calendar year generally cannot become eligible merely by waiting until age 55 to take the distribution.[3]
  • The exception applies to distributions from qualifying employer retirement plans; this specific separation-from-service exception does not apply to IRA distributions.[1]
  • The plan relationship matters. The exception is tied to separation from the employer maintaining the plan from which the qualifying distribution is made.[2][3]
  • Rolling assets from a qualifying employer plan into an IRA before taking the distribution can change which early-distribution exception applies to those assets.
  • Qualified public safety employees can have a more favorable rule: generally the earlier of age 50 or 25 years of service under the plan, subject to the statutory requirements.[2][3]
  • A similar special rule applies to qualifying private-sector firefighters.[2][3]
  • Governmental 457(b) plans follow a different early-distribution framework and are generally not subject to the 10% additional tax except for certain rolled-in amounts.[1][2]

Rule of 55 in One Sentence

> ROIStreet Definition > > The Rule of 55 is the informal name for the federal separation-from-service exception that can remove the 10% additional early-distribution tax from qualifying employer-plan distributions when a participant separates from the employer in or after the calendar year the participant reaches age 55.

The word can matters.

The distribution still has to satisfy the applicable tax and plan rules.

Why the Rule Exists

Federal law generally imposes an additional:

10% tax

on taxable early distributions from many retirement plans when the participant is under age:

59½.[1][2]

That additional tax is designed separately from ordinary income tax.

Section 72(t) then provides a list of exceptions.

The separation-from-service exception commonly called the Rule of 55 is one of them.

The concept is straightforward:

A participant who leaves the employer near retirement age can, if the statutory conditions are met, access qualifying employer-plan money without waiting until age 59½ solely to avoid the additional 10% tax.

That does not convert pre-tax retirement money into tax-free money.

The Rule of 55 Does Not Eliminate Ordinary Income Tax

This is the most important misconception to correct.

Assume a participant qualifies for the Rule of 55 and takes:

$40,000

from a traditional pre-tax 401(k).

If the distribution is otherwise fully taxable:

  • taxable income can still increase by $40,000
  • federal income tax can still apply
  • state income tax can potentially apply

What the Rule of 55 can eliminate is the separate:

10% additional tax on early distributions

that might otherwise apply.[1][2][3]

Simplified comparison

Assume a fully taxable $40,000 distribution.

Without an exception:

  • ordinary income tax: potentially applies
  • 10% additional tax: potentially $4,000

With a valid Rule of 55 exception:

  • ordinary income tax: still potentially applies
  • 10% additional tax: not imposed under this exception

The actual income-tax result depends on the taxpayer's circumstances.

The Calendar Year Test

IRS Publication 575 states that, for the ordinary separation-from-service exception, the participant must separate from service:

in or after the year in which the participant reaches age 55.[3]

This is a calendar-year test.

It is not simply:

"Was I already 55 on my last day of work?"

Example: Turns 55 in December, Leaves in March

Assume:

  • 55th birthday: December 10, 2026
  • employment ends: March 31, 2026

The participant separated during the calendar year in which age 55 is reached.

That can satisfy the age-and-separation timing element of the ordinary exception even though the participant was only 54 on the actual separation date.[3]

This is one of the most useful details in the rule.

Example: Leaves the Year Before Turning 55

Assume:

  • employment ends: December 31, 2025
  • participant turns 55: January 2, 2026

The participant separated before the calendar year in which age 55 is reached.

Waiting until later in 2026 to take a distribution generally does not repair the timing problem.

IRS Publication 575 gives the same conceptual result: a person who separates too early does not qualify merely because the later distribution occurs after age 55.[3]

Separation Timing vs. Distribution Timing

Two different dates matter.

Separation date

This determines whether the age-based separation requirement is satisfied.

Distribution date

The distribution must occur after the qualifying separation.

A participant does not need to withdraw money immediately after leaving.

The exception can remain relevant to later qualifying distributions from that plan, subject to plan terms and tax law.

The critical mistake is focusing only on the participant's age when the money comes out while ignoring the year employment ended.

Which Plans Can Use the Rule of 55?

The IRS lists the separation-from-service exception for qualified retirement plans other than IRAs.[1][2]

Potential employer-plan structures can include qualifying:

  • 401(k) plans
  • profit-sharing plans
  • certain pension plans
  • 403(a) arrangements
  • 403(b) arrangements

The exact distribution right is still controlled by the plan.

A tax exception does not force a plan to offer a particular withdrawal schedule.

The Rule of 55 Is Not an IRA Rule

The IRS exception table specifically distinguishes retirement plans from IRAs.

For the separation-from-service exception:

  • retirement plans: yes
  • IRAs: no[1]

That means a traditional IRA does not become eligible for this particular exception simply because its owner leaves a job at age 55.

IRA distributions before age 59½ use the IRA early-distribution framework and its applicable exceptions.

Why a Rollover Can Matter

Suppose a worker separates from Employer A during the year age 55 is reached.

The worker's Employer A 401(k) contains:

$300,000

The worker has two possible transactions.

Path 1: Keep assets in Employer A's plan

If the plan permits distributions and the statutory requirements are satisfied, the Rule of 55 can remain relevant to qualifying distributions from that plan.

Path 2: Roll the entire balance to an IRA

Once the money is in the IRA, a later IRA distribution is evaluated under the IRA rules.

The Rule of 55 separation-from-service exception does not apply to that IRA distribution.[1]

The rollover may still make sense for other reasons.

The point is narrower:

A rollover can change access to a tax exception.

That feature should be identified before moving the entire account.

Employer Plan vs. IRA

FeatureQualified employer planIRA
Ordinary Rule of 55 separation exceptionCan applyNo
Standard early-distribution age without an exception59½59½
Ordinary income tax on pre-tax taxable distributionGenerally appliesGenerally applies
10% additional tax before 59½Can apply unless exceptionCan apply unless IRA exception
Employer-plan loansMay be available under plan termsLoans not permitted
Investment menuPlan-selectedProvider/account-selected
Rollover flexibilityPlan-specificBroad IRA transfer/rollover rules

The Rule of 55 is one difference among many.

Which Employer's Plan Matters?

The exception is tied to separation from service with the employer maintaining the plan.[2][3]

That matters when a person has several old 401(k)s.

Consider:

  • Employer A 401(k): $100,000
  • Employer B 401(k): $250,000
  • worker left Employer A at age 48
  • worker leaves Employer B during the year age 55 is reached

The worker's qualifying separation is from Employer B.

The Employer B plan is therefore the straightforward account to test under the Rule of 55.

The fact that the worker is now 55 does not automatically transform Employer A's older plan into a qualifying Rule of 55 plan.

Can Old 401(k) Money Be Moved Into the Current Plan Before Separation?

Some current employer plans accept rollovers from prior qualified plans.[7][8]

If old eligible assets are rolled into the current employer's plan, they become assets of the receiving plan under its terms.

That can change future distribution mechanics.

However, this type of planning should be checked before a job change because:

  • the receiving plan must accept the rollover
  • investment choices can change
  • fees can change
  • source-account records matter
  • withdrawal rights are plan-specific
  • specialized tax issues can exist

A rollover should not be performed solely because a general rule sounds advantageous.

The Rule of 55 Does Not Require a Full Cash-Out

The tax exception does not itself require the participant to withdraw the entire account at once.

A plan may permit:

  • lump-sum distributions
  • partial withdrawals
  • installments
  • other forms of distribution

The plan document determines which distribution forms are available.

If a qualifying distribution is made under the Rule of 55, the exception can apply to the taxable amount that otherwise would face the 10% additional tax.

The participant should not assume every former-employer plan allows unlimited on-demand partial withdrawals.

A Plan Can Be More Restrictive Than the Tax Code

Tax law can say:

This type of distribution is not subject to the 10% additional tax.

The plan can separately say:

This distribution is not currently available under the plan's terms.

Those are different questions.

Before relying on the Rule of 55, a participant should verify:

  1. Is the participant eligible for a distribution?
  2. What forms of distribution does the plan permit?
  3. Can partial distributions be taken?
  4. Is the account subject to minimum distribution sizes or frequency restrictions?
  5. How will the plan code the distribution on Form 1099-R?

What If the Form 1099-R Does Not Show the Exception?

IRS Topic 558 explains that Form 5329 can be required when an exception applies but the distribution code on Form 1099-R does not identify the exception or is otherwise incorrect.[2][9]

The existence of the exception depends on the tax rules and facts.

The reporting code matters administratively, but it is not the only source of legal eligibility.

Accurate records of:

  • date of birth
  • employment termination
  • plan identity
  • distribution date

can therefore be important.

Rule of 55 vs. Age 59½

IssueRule of 55Age 59½
Requires separation from serviceYes, for this exceptionNo
Employer-plan relationship mattersYesNot in the same way
Applies to IRA under this ruleNoIRA 10% additional-tax age threshold generally ends at 59½
Can apply before 59½YesNot applicable
Ordinary income tax automatically eliminatedNoNo
Plan must permit the distributionYesYes for employer-plan access

Age 59½ is a general threshold in early-distribution tax law.

The Rule of 55 is a narrower exception that can operate earlier.

You Do Not Need to Wait Until 59½ to Use Another Exception

The Rule of 55 is only one Section 72(t) exception.

IRS guidance lists other possible exceptions involving circumstances such as:

  • death
  • disability
  • terminal illness
  • qualified domestic relations orders
  • certain medical expenses
  • IRS levies
  • qualified reservist distributions
  • qualified birth or adoption distributions
  • certain emergency personal expenses
  • domestic abuse distributions
  • substantially equal periodic payments[1][2]

Each exception has its own conditions.

A person who does not qualify for the Rule of 55 may still qualify for a different exception.

Rule of 55 vs. Substantially Equal Periodic Payments

A separate exception exists for a qualifying series of substantially equal periodic payments, often called SEPPs or 72(t) payments.[1][2][6]

This is not the Rule of 55.

FeatureRule of 55SEPP exception
Main triggerQualifying separation from serviceProper series of calculated periodic payments
Ordinary age thresholdSeparation in/after year age 55Can begin younger
IRA can use this exceptionNoYes
Employer plan can useYesYes, with additional service-separation conditions
Requires continuing payment scheduleNo special SEPP scheduleYes
Modification riskPlan/tax rules applyImproper modification can trigger recapture consequences

SEPP rules are technical enough to deserve separate analysis.

They should not be treated as a casual substitute for the Rule of 55.

The Special Public-Safety Rule

Federal law provides a more favorable separation-from-service exception for certain qualified public safety employees.

IRS Topic 558 and Publication 575 state that qualifying distributions can avoid the 10% additional tax when the employee separates in or after the year in which the employee reaches the earlier of:

  • age 50, or
  • 25 years of service under the plan.[2][3]

This is materially different from the ordinary age-55 rule.

Who Can Be a Qualified Public Safety Employee?

IRS Publication 575 identifies qualifying categories that can include workers providing:

  • police protection
  • firefighting services
  • emergency medical services
  • corrections services
  • qualifying forensic security services

and specified federal public-safety roles such as certain:

  • federal law-enforcement officers
  • customs and border-protection officers
  • federal firefighters
  • air traffic controllers
  • nuclear materials couriers
  • U.S. Capitol Police
  • Supreme Court Police
  • diplomatic security special agents[3]

Eligibility is statutory.

A job title that sounds public-safety-related does not automatically establish qualification.

The 25-Years-of-Service Alternative

The public-safety exception now includes an important service-based path.

Assume a qualifying public safety employee:

  • entered covered service at age 22
  • completes 25 years of service under the plan at age 47
  • separates during that year

The applicable threshold is the earlier of:

  • age 50, or
  • 25 years of service

The 25-year service threshold is earlier in this example.

If the statutory and plan requirements are satisfied, the employee can potentially qualify for the special exception before age 50.[2][3]

That result is specific to qualifying public-safety rules.

It is not part of the ordinary Rule of 55.

Private-Sector Firefighters

IRS guidance also extends a similar special exception to qualifying private-sector firefighters.

Publication 575 describes the threshold as separation in or after the year in which the firefighter reaches the earlier of:

  • age 50, or
  • 25 years of service under the plan.[3]

This should not be generalized to every private-sector occupation.

Governmental 457(b) Plans Are Different

A governmental 457(b) deserves special attention because the ordinary 10% additional-tax framework is different.

IRS guidance states that distributions from an eligible state or local governmental 457(b) plan generally are not subject to the 10% additional tax, except for distributions attributable to amounts rolled into the 457(b) from another type of qualified plan or IRA.[1][2]

That means a participant with a governmental 457(b) should not automatically apply the 401(k) Rule of 55 analysis.

The account type must be identified first.

Example: Worker Leaves During the Age-55 Year

Assume:

  • birthday: November 20, 2026
  • job separation: February 28, 2026
  • account: former employer's qualified 401(k)
  • participant takes a taxable distribution in July 2026

The separation occurred during the calendar year in which the participant reaches age 55.

The age-and-separation condition can therefore be satisfied even though the participant had not reached the birthday when employment ended.[3]

Ordinary income tax can still apply.

Example: Worker Leaves at 54 in the Prior Calendar Year

Assume:

  • birthday: January 3, 2026
  • separation: December 15, 2025
  • distribution: February 2026

The worker is 55 when the distribution occurs.

But the separation occurred in the prior calendar year.

The ordinary Rule of 55 exception generally does not apply.[3]

The distribution would need another exception to avoid the 10% additional tax if it is otherwise an early taxable distribution.

Example: Worker Leaves at 57

Assume:

  • participant age at separation: 57
  • account: employer's qualified 401(k)
  • plan permits post-employment partial distributions

The separation occurs after the qualifying age year.

The age-and-separation requirement can be satisfied.

The participant does not lose the exception merely because the separation occurred at 57 rather than exactly 55.

Example: IRA After a Qualifying Separation

Assume a worker qualifies under the Rule of 55 and then directly rolls the entire old 401(k) into a traditional IRA.

The worker later takes an IRA distribution at age 56.

The earlier qualifying separation does not turn the IRA distribution into a Rule of 55 distribution.

The IRA must be evaluated under the IRA early-distribution rules.[1][5]

Example: Two Old Employer Plans

Assume:

  • Employer A separation: age 47
  • Employer B separation: year age 55 is reached
  • both old 401(k)s remain open

The worker should not assume the age-55 separation from Employer B automatically applies to Employer A's plan.

The statutory exception is tied to separation from service with the employer maintaining the plan.[2][3]

This account-by-account distinction can matter materially.

Taxes and Withholding Are Separate Questions

Three different tax concepts can appear in one distribution.

1. Ordinary income tax

Pre-tax retirement distributions are generally taxable to the extent they have not already been taxed.

2. 10% additional tax

This is the tax the Rule of 55 can potentially eliminate.

3. Withholding

The plan may withhold federal income tax from the payment under applicable distribution and withholding rules.

Withholding is a payment toward tax.

It is not necessarily the final tax liability.

A participant should not interpret a 20% withholding amount, for example, as proof that the final federal tax rate on the distribution is 20%.

Does the Rule of 55 Apply to Roth 401(k) Money?

The Rule of 55 addresses the 10% additional tax.

Roth 401(k) distributions have a separate question:

Is the distribution qualified for tax-free Roth treatment?

A designated Roth distribution generally must satisfy applicable qualification requirements, including the five-taxable-year requirement and an appropriate qualifying event.

A Rule of 55 exception can affect the additional-tax analysis without automatically making a nonqualified Roth distribution fully tax-free.

Tax source and distribution qualification should therefore be analyzed separately.

Does the Rule of 55 Apply to a 403(b)?

The IRS separation-from-service exception applies to retirement plans rather than IRAs and can encompass qualifying 403(b) arrangements.[1][2]

However:

  • the participant must satisfy the applicable separation test
  • the plan must permit the distribution
  • tax source and reporting still matter

A 403(b) participant should not assume the plan's distribution procedures are identical to a 401(k).

Does the Rule of 55 Apply to a Pension?

Qualified pension plans can also fall within the retirement-plan exception framework.[1][3]

But a pension's available distribution form may be very different from a 401(k).

A traditional defined benefit plan may provide:

  • monthly annuity payments
  • early-retirement reductions
  • survivor forms
  • a lump-sum option in some plans

The Rule of 55 addresses the additional-tax question.

It does not rewrite the pension's benefit formula or distribution options.

A Rule of 55 Decision Framework

Step 1: Identify the account type

Is it:

  • 401(k)
  • 403(b)
  • pension or other qualified plan
  • governmental 457(b)
  • IRA

Do not proceed from the generic label "retirement account."

Step 2: Identify the employer maintaining the plan

Which employer sponsored the account?

Step 3: Identify the separation year

What calendar year did employment end with that employer?

Step 4: Identify the age reached during that year

Did the participant reach age 55 during or before that calendar year?

For qualifying public-safety employees or private-sector firefighters, test the special age/service threshold.

Step 5: Confirm the plan permits a distribution

Tax eligibility and plan availability are separate.

Step 6: Identify the tax source

Is the distribution:

  • pre-tax
  • designated Roth
  • after-tax basis
  • a combination

Step 7: Check whether another exception is more relevant

Examples can include disability, SEPPs or another statutory exception.

Step 8: Review rollover consequences before moving assets

A transfer to an IRA can change the Rule of 55 analysis.

Step 9: Confirm reporting

Review Form 1099-R and determine whether Form 5329 is required.

This sequence reduces the chance of treating the Rule of 55 as a generic age-based permission slip.

Common Rule of 55 Mistakes

Treating the distribution as income-tax free

The rule generally removes only the additional 10% tax.

Looking only at age on the distribution date

The separation calendar year matters.

Leaving too early

Separating in the year before the participant reaches 55 generally fails the ordinary test.

Waiting for the birthday unnecessarily

A worker can potentially qualify by separating earlier in the calendar year in which age 55 will be reached.

Applying the rule to an IRA

The specific separation-from-service exception does not apply to IRAs.

Assuming every old 401(k) qualifies

The employer maintaining the plan and the separation from that employer matter.

Rolling first and analyzing later

An IRA rollover can change the exception available for future distributions.

Ignoring plan distribution rules

A participant can satisfy federal tax requirements but still face plan-specific limits on how money can be taken.

Applying the ordinary age-55 rule to a governmental 457(b)

Governmental 457(b) plans have a different additional-tax framework.

Missing the public-safety service rule

Qualifying public safety employees can potentially use the earlier of age 50 or 25 years of service.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Rule of 55?

It is the informal name for a federal exception that can remove the 10% additional tax from qualifying employer-plan distributions after a participant separates from service in or after the calendar year the participant reaches age 55.[1][3]

Do I have to be 55 on my last day of work?

Not necessarily. IRS Publication 575 uses a calendar-year test. A person who reaches 55 later in the same calendar year can potentially satisfy the age-and-separation condition.[3]

What if I leave my job at 54 and turn 55 the next year?

The ordinary Rule of 55 generally does not apply because the separation occurred before the calendar year in which age 55 was reached.[3]

Does the Rule of 55 make withdrawals tax-free?

No. Ordinary income tax can still apply. The rule is an exception to the 10% additional early-distribution tax.[1][2][3]

Does the Rule of 55 apply to an IRA?

No. The IRS exception table lists the separation-from-service exception for retirement plans and not IRAs.[1]

Can I roll my 401(k) into an IRA and still use the Rule of 55?

The later IRA distribution does not qualify under this specific separation-from-service exception. A rollover can therefore change access to the Rule of 55.[1][5]

Does the Rule of 55 apply to every old 401(k)?

Not automatically. The separation must relate to the employer maintaining the plan whose distribution is being tested.[2][3]

Can I take more than one Rule of 55 distribution?

Federal tax law does not make the exception a one-time dollar allowance. Whether repeated or partial distributions are available depends on the plan's distribution provisions.

What is the public-safety version of the rule?

For qualifying public safety employees, the threshold is generally separation in or after the year the employee reaches the earlier of age 50 or 25 years of service under the plan.[2][3]

Does the Rule of 55 apply to private-sector firefighters?

IRS Publication 575 describes a special exception for qualifying private-sector firefighters using the earlier-of-age-50-or-25-years-of-service threshold.[3]

Is a governmental 457(b) subject to the Rule of 55?

A governmental 457(b) generally does not need the ordinary Rule of 55 because its distributions are generally not subject to the 10% additional tax, except for certain rolled-in amounts.[1][2]

How is the Rule of 55 reported?

The plan reports the distribution on Form 1099-R. IRS Topic 558 explains that Form 5329 can be required when an exception applies but the distribution code does not identify it or is incorrect.[2][9]

The Bottom Line

The Rule of 55 is valuable because it creates an earlier access point to certain employer retirement-plan assets.

But it is not simply:

"Turn 55 and withdraw retirement money without penalty."

The actual rule is more precise.

For most participants:

  • the account must be a qualifying employer plan
  • the participant must separate from the employer maintaining that plan
  • separation must occur in or after the calendar year in which age 55 is reached
  • the plan must permit the distribution
  • ordinary income tax can still apply
  • the exception does not follow the assets into an IRA

The calendar-year rule can help a participant who separates before the actual 55th birthday but during the year age 55 will be reached.

It can also disqualify someone who leaves only a few days before the beginning of that calendar year.

Qualified public safety employees and private-sector firefighters have a separate, more favorable threshold based generally on the earlier of age 50 or 25 years of service under the plan.

The most useful question is therefore not:

"Am I 55?"

It is:

"Which employer's plan is this, when did I separate from that employer, what age or service threshold applied in that calendar year, and where will the assets be when I take the distribution?"

That is the framework that determines whether the Rule of 55 is actually available.

Sources & References

  1. IRS: Retirement topics — Exceptions to tax on early distributions
  2. IRS: Topic no. 558 — Additional tax on early distributions from retirement plans other than IRAs
  3. IRS: Publication 575 — Pension and Annuity Income
  4. IRS: 401(k) Resource Guide — General Distribution Rules
  5. IRS: Topic no. 557 — Additional tax on early distributions from traditional and Roth IRAs
  6. IRS: Substantially equal periodic payments
  7. IRS: Retirement topics — Termination of employment
  8. IRS: Rollovers of retirement plan and IRA distributions
  9. IRS: Form 5329 and Instructions

Educational Disclaimer

ROIStreet publishes educational content intended to help readers understand retirement-plan distribution rules. Nothing in this article is personalized investment, tax, legal, employment or financial advice, or a recommendation to retire, separate from employment, take a distribution, keep assets in an employer plan or complete a rollover. Plan terms, employment history, age, years of service, account type, tax source and individual circumstances can materially change the result.

The ROIStreet Reader Promise

We strive to explain before we evaluate, present evidence before opinions, discuss risks alongside potential benefits, distinguish facts from analysis, and correct material errors transparently.

Our purpose is to help readers better understand investing—not to tell them what to do.

Definitions used in this guide

Risk
Investment risk is the uncertainty surrounding future investment outcomes, including the possibility of losing income, purchasing power, liquidity, or some or all of the capital invested.
Return
Investment return is the gain or loss produced by an investment over a period, including changes in value and applicable income such as interest, dividends or distributions.
Liquidity
Liquidity describes how readily an investment can be converted to cash without substantial delay, transaction cost or adverse price impact. Liquidity can change with market conditions.
Volatility
Volatility describes the magnitude and frequency of price changes over time. It is an important measure of market uncertainty, but it does not capture every form of investment risk.
Time Horizon
An investment time horizon is the expected number of months, years or decades until money is needed for a financial goal. Time horizon affects how investors evaluate volatility, liquidity and other risks.

We may earn a commission if you open an account through links on this page. Our editorial analysis is independent and is never influenced by commercial partnerships. Full disclosure.